Publicly Funded Stadiums

Data from a thirty year, thirty city study reveals 27 of the stadiums have no influence on the economy and 3 lost money causing an economic drain!  The players and owners are the (only) people benefiting from public stadiums.  Five teams (so far) this decade have opened new stadiums.  These teams have player salaries that exceed the leagues average by 28 to 51 percent!

More information:

Oh No!  They're going to leave...  Think of all those jobs that will be lost.  What Baseball really means to the economy.  October 25, 1997.  The beginning?

MAJOR LEAGUE LOSERS
The Real Cost of Sports and Who's Paying for It
By Mark S. Rosentraub

Pro sports teams are small businesses that don't deserve the subsidies they get. The industry never accounts for more than 0.5% of jobs or salaries in any region. (By contrast, in the average metropolitan area, restaurants provide nearly 7% of jobs.) Its most successful teams, such as the New York Yankees and Dallas Cowboys, bring in only around $100 million in annual revenue. The business does not provide local economies with any noticeable growth, Rosentraub writes. Yet Cleveland, for example, is spending about $1 billion over a 25-year period for three pro sports franchises.

What about all those jobs that will be lost?
Think again! check here or here or here
Notice the posting dates on some of these!  Companies cannot find employees!

Index page for more of our "Anger and Concerns"
http://www.bergesch.com-HomePage